|
Pacific Close Estates Ltd Company Number: 07450803 MINUTES
OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING |
|
Property: |
PACIFIC CLOSE ESTATE |
Client ref: |
PAC000 |
|
Meeting: |
ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING |
Meeting No: |
|
|
Venue: |
THE DOCK OFFICE, OCEAN
VILLAGE |
||
|
Date and time: |
THURSDAY 18th APRIL
2024 AT 10.30 A.M. |
|
|
|
Present |
Title |
Representing |
|
Mr R Vose Mr R Allsworth Mr T O’Connor Mr & Mrs D Craig Mr A Power Mr & Mrs Stoddard Mr D Bass Dr J Correa |
83 52 27 72 85 60 54 79 |
|
|
In attendance |
|
|
|
A N Other |
|
|
Minutes of Meeting
|
Item |
|
Action |
|||||
|
1.00 |
|
|
|||||
|
2.00 |
Minutes of the last
Meeting held on Wednesday 10th May 2023 No comments or amendments
have been received therefore the Minutes are taken as read and approved. |
|
|||||
|
3.00 |
Chairmans Report Robert Vose (RV) explained that PCEL had not
appointed Napier as company secretary of PCEL PCEL had not barred Napier from
attending. RV had spoken with Aileen
and it was mutually agreed this was not a good use of their time. The
information circulated by Dr Correa (Dr C) was incorrect. RV gave a brief overview of the actions being taken
to assess the condition of the jetty and determine appropriate options and
costs. Consulting engineers were commissioned to carry out
a survey of the jetty to determine its condition and provide recommendations
for future actions. Following an initial assessment, the advice received
from the consulting engineers was that the decking and support structure is
unsafe, therefore the jetty should be fenced off to prevent access. Three options are being evaluated and cost estimate
obtained: -
Legal advice has been obtained which confirmed the
Jetty is within the demised premises and Landlords permission may be required
to demolish or materially change the area of the jetty. RV commented that leaseholders would be invited to
comment via PCRA on the recommendations for the jetty once options had been
evaluated and quotations received from contractors. In the meantime, Napiers have been asked to obtain a
quotation to increase the height of the existing barrier rails around the
jetty so the current safety fencing may be removed. |
|
|||||
|
4.00 |
Ongoing Matters a) Insurance. Rod Allsworth (RA)
commented on the significant increase in the cost of insurance. Last year the
premium was £16k. The best premium obtained for the current year obtained by
Coversure was £29k. Two claims were for repairs to block roofs however, the
vast majority of claims are for internal leaks from fittings within
apartments. RV commented that the work by RA with insurers saves paying
Napier a commission and helps to reduce premiums each year. The current
excess is £2500. b)
Dividend Payment. RV explained that a dividend
payment was possible last year as fees had been received for several lease
extensions. The number of requests has declined as owners may be waiting to
see the impact of Gove’s Leasehold Bill currently out for consultation which
may remove necessity for lease extensions. c) Membership of PCEL. Dr Correa (Dr C) asked
if house owners could join PCEL. RV explained that only flats were permitted
to join PCEL but they could obtain representation on estate matter by joining
PCRA. d) Alterations to property.
There
was a general discussion regarding the requirement to obtain permission from
PCEL before carrying out alterations to a property e.g. replacement of door
and windows and painting of external areas. RV pointed out that on selling
their property owners are required to state that all requisite permissions
have been obtained for any alterations or modifications to the property. e) Parking Control. RV explained that Napier
have been asked to liaise with PCRA regarding options to monitor and manage
parking arrangements. Untaxed vehicles stored in the small carpark were
reported to MDL and subsequently removed. Dr C commented that a car parked in
a residents parking space without permission was reported to Napier who had
the car removed. f) Security Arrangements. RV explained he had
discussions with the security company employed by MDL. The cost of increasing
security arrangements was discussed with PCRA who are currently unwilling to
incur additional costs. At this time significant improvements have been
achieved around the Estate at a minimal cost to the Service Charge accounts. |
|
|||||
|
5.00 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
There being no further
business the Meeting closed at 12.10 p.m. |
|
|||||